Reference

• ALA. (2003). DRM: Statement of Library and Higher Education Concerns. Retrieved November 12, 2006 from http://www.ala.org/ala/washoff/WOissues/copyrightb/digitalrights/digitalrightsmanagement.htm
• Albanese, A. (2001). DMCA lawsuit turns tables on recording industry. Library Journal, 126(11), 5.
• Allner, I. (2004). Copyright and the delivery of library services to distance learners. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 9(3/4), 179-192.
• Burk, D. L. (2002). Anti-Circumvention Misuse. Paper presented on TPRC Conference. Retrieved October 12, 2006 from http://tprc.org/papers/2002/29/misuse.pdf
• Craig, C. E. (2003). “Lending" institutions: The impact of the e-book on the American library system. University of Illinois Law Review, (4), 1087-1113.
• Eschenfelder, K. R. & Desai, A. C. (2004). Software as protest: The unexpected resiliency of US based DeCSS linking and posting. The Information Society, (20) 101-116.
• Ferullo, D. L. (2004). Major copyright is sues in academic libraries: Legal implications of a digital environment. Journal of Library Administration, 40(1/2), 23-40.
• Kirby, C. (2001a, August 6). Martyr or criminal? Debate over electronic copyright law rages as Russian programmers sits in a San Jose jail. The San Francisco Chronicle, p. B1.
• Kirby, C. (2001b, December 14). Charges dropped in copyright case; Russian programmer to be set free. The San Francisco Chronicle, p. B1.
• Kirby, C. (2002, December 18). Russian company acquitted in Adobe EBook copyright case. The San Francisco Chronicle, p. B1.
• Lee, J. (2001a, September 10). Compressed data: Travel advisory for Russian programmers. The New York Times, p. C4.
• Lee, J. (2001b, December 14). In digital copyright case, programmer can go home. The New York Times, p. C4.
• Lessig, L. (1999). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
• Lipinski, T. A. (2003). The myth of technological neutrality in copyright and the rights of institutional users: Recent legal challenges to the information organization as mediator and the impact of the DMCA, WIPO, and TEACH. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 54(9), 824-835.
• Lutzker, A. P. (1999). Primer on the Digital Millennium: What the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and the Copyright Term Extension Act Mean for the Library Community. Retrieval November 2, 2006 from http://www.arl.org/info/frn/copy/primer.html
• Maxwell, T. A. (2004). Mapping information policy frames: The politics of the digital millennium copyright act. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 55(1), 3-12.
• Pruitt, S. (2001, October 11). Ashcroft to academics: DMCA is not your problem. InfoWorld. Retrieved October 20, 2006 from http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/01/10/11/011011hndmca.html
• Roush, W. (2001). Breaking Microsoft's E-book code. MIT's Technology Review, November. Retrieved October 20, 2006 from http://www.techreview.com/InfoTech/12645/page1/
• Schiller, H. (1996). Information Inequality: The Deepening Social Crisis in America. New York: Routledge.
• Simons, B. (2001). Viewpoint: The ACM declaration in Felten v. RIAA. Communications of the ACM, 44 (10), 23-26.
• U.S. Copyright Office. (1998). U.S. Copyright Office Summary of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Retrieved September 10, 2003 from http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf
• Vaidhyanathan, S. (2001). Copyrights and Copywrongs. New York: NYU Press.